UEF T3 AA should be reviewed

life · 06-07-2007, 12:04 PM

Hi all,

i'd played UEF for a while now and i think T3 AA sucks.
Why is there so many differences between UEF T3 AA and the other factions T3 AA.

Cybran T3 AA :

Nanite Missile System (Anti Air, Normal): 137.14 damage per second, range: 0 (0.0m) - 60 (1.17km)
dps / cost: 0.081, combat rating[1]: 585.5, combat rating / cost[2]: 0.344
projectile physics: armor: , acceleration: 5 (97.7m/s2), max speed: 35 (684m/s), lifetime: 3s
projectile: 24 damage, muzzle velocity[3]: 25 (488m/s)
fire cycle: 4 projectiles every 0.7 second(s) = 0.7 second(s) total, 96 damage total
turret pitch: 25° ±40° (180°/s), turret yaw: 0° ±180° (180°/s)

Aeon T3 AA :

Zealot AA Missile (Anti Air, Normal): 100.00 damage per second, range: 0 (0.0m) - 60 (1.17km)
dps / cost: 0.059, combat rating[1]: 547.7, combat rating / cost[2]: 0.322
projectile physics: armor: , acceleration: 5 (97.7m/s2), max speed: 35 (684m/s), lifetime: 10s
projectile: 40 damage, muzzle velocity[3]: 25 (488m/s)
fire cycle: 2 times 1 projectile every 0.3 second(s) + 0.5 second(s) reload = 0.8 second(s) total, 80 damage total
turret pitch: 25° ±80° (180°/s), turret yaw: 0° ±360° (180°/s)

UEF T3 AA :

Flayer SAM Launcher (Anti Air, Normal): 96.00 damage per second, range: 0 (0.0m) - 60 (1.17km)
dps / cost: 0.056, combat rating[1]: 513.8, combat rating / cost[2]: 0.302
projectile physics: armor: , acceleration: 2.5 (48.8m/s2), max speed: 30 (586m/s), lifetime: 4s
projectile: 40 damage, muzzle velocity[3]: 15 (293m/s)
fire cycle: 6 times 1 projectile every 0.3 second(s) + 1.0 second(s) reload = 2.5 second(s) total, 240 damage total
turret pitch: 25° ±80° (180°/s), turret yaw: 0° ±180° (180°/s)

Stats are explicit, the velocity and speed of the UEF T3 AA rockets are half of Cybs and Aeon

UEF T3 AA should be balanced.

What's your opinion

FunkOff · 06-08-2007, 12:58 AM

How is this even an issue? It's factional diversity.

life · 06-08-2007, 08:40 AM

Hi Funk,
i played Aeon and Cybs for a while now and i think the difference is realy handicapping.
Obviously i addapt, but the economic effort is bigger than spamming T3 AA.

That's why i think it's unbalanced.

A lot more reply on GPG =>
GPGnet :: View topic - GPG team - UEF T3 AA must be reviewed

FunkOff · 06-08-2007, 03:22 PM

Try flak? .

life · 06-08-2007, 03:51 PM

Yes i use them and it's quite efficient...

Planes circling in front of the base with some air staging is quite efficient too, there's always a way to counter these kind of attacks.
But the effort is bigger...

I'm aware that UEF are much more competitiv now, and it's not quite often that you may face a T3 air bombing (thx to the last "major" patch).

Nevertheless i hope there will be a little tweaking in the future =)

Thygrrr · 06-21-2007, 03:23 PM

It has been reviewed in the current 3255 hotfix.

Its missiles are considerably faster now.

life · 06-22-2007, 12:25 PM

héhé yup i'v posted it in the hotfix 3255 news, that's a great news.
I'v tested it and it's a real cool change.

06-07-2007, 12:04 PM	#1 (permalink)
life Junior Member Join Date: Mar 2007 Posts: 11	UEF T3 AA should be reviewed Hi all, i'd played UEF for a while now and i think T3 AA sucks. Why is there so many differences between UEF T3 AA and the other factions T3 AA. Cybran T3 AA : Nanite Missile System (Anti Air, Normal): 137.14 damage per second, range: 0 (0.0m) - 60 (1.17km) dps / cost: 0.081, combat rating[1]: 585.5, combat rating / cost[2]: 0.344 projectile physics: armor: , acceleration: 5 (97.7m/s2), max speed: 35 (684m/s), lifetime: 3s projectile: 24 damage, muzzle velocity[3]: 25 (488m/s) fire cycle: 4 projectiles every 0.7 second(s) = 0.7 second(s) total, 96 damage total turret pitch: 25° ±40° (180°/s), turret yaw: 0° ±180° (180°/s) Aeon T3 AA : Zealot AA Missile (Anti Air, Normal): 100.00 damage per second, range: 0 (0.0m) - 60 (1.17km) dps / cost: 0.059, combat rating[1]: 547.7, combat rating / cost[2]: 0.322 projectile physics: armor: , acceleration: 5 (97.7m/s2), max speed: 35 (684m/s), lifetime: 10s projectile: 40 damage, muzzle velocity[3]: 25 (488m/s) fire cycle: 2 times 1 projectile every 0.3 second(s) + 0.5 second(s) reload = 0.8 second(s) total, 80 damage total turret pitch: 25° ±80° (180°/s), turret yaw: 0° ±360° (180°/s) UEF T3 AA : Flayer SAM Launcher (Anti Air, Normal): 96.00 damage per second, range: 0 (0.0m) - 60 (1.17km) dps / cost: 0.056, combat rating[1]: 513.8, combat rating / cost[2]: 0.302 projectile physics: armor: , acceleration: 2.5 (48.8m/s2), max speed: 30 (586m/s), lifetime: 4s projectile: 40 damage, muzzle velocity[3]: 15 (293m/s) fire cycle: 6 times 1 projectile every 0.3 second(s) + 1.0 second(s) reload = 2.5 second(s) total, 240 damage total turret pitch: 25° ±80° (180°/s), turret yaw: 0° ±180° (180°/s) Stats are explicit, the velocity and speed of the UEF T3 AA rockets are half of Cybs and Aeon UEF T3 AA should be balanced. What's your opinion Last edited by life : 06-07-2007 at 12:53 PM.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

06-08-2007, 12:58 AM	#2 (permalink)
FunkOff Junior Member Join Date: Mar 2007 Posts: 12	How is this even an issue? It's factional diversity.

06-08-2007, 08:40 AM	#3 (permalink)
life Junior Member Join Date: Mar 2007 Posts: 11	Hi Funk, i played Aeon and Cybs for a while now and i think the difference is realy handicapping. Obviously i addapt, but the economic effort is bigger than spamming T3 AA. That's why i think it's unbalanced. A lot more reply on GPG => GPGnet :: View topic - GPG team - UEF T3 AA must be reviewed

06-08-2007, 03:22 PM	#4 (permalink)
FunkOff Junior Member Join Date: Mar 2007 Posts: 12	Try flak? .

06-08-2007, 03:51 PM	#5 (permalink)
life Junior Member Join Date: Mar 2007 Posts: 11	Yes i use them and it's quite efficient... Planes circling in front of the base with some air staging is quite efficient too, there's always a way to counter these kind of attacks. But the effort is bigger... I'm aware that UEF are much more competitiv now, and it's not quite often that you may face a T3 air bombing (thx to the last "major" patch). Nevertheless i hope there will be a little tweaking in the future =)

06-21-2007, 03:23 PM	#6 (permalink)
Thygrrr Junior Member Join Date: Mar 2007 Posts: 10	It has been reviewed in the current 3255 hotfix. Its missiles are considerably faster now.

06-22-2007, 12:25 PM	#7 (permalink)
life Junior Member Join Date: Mar 2007 Posts: 11	héhé yup i'v posted it in the hotfix 3255 news, that's a great news. I'v tested it and it's a real cool change.